Armand Niculescu

Armand is 32 year old designer and programmer employed at Media Division. He has a strong interest in Flash/Actionscript, 3D and photography.

7 responses to “A photographer’s secret weapon – Portrait Professional 9”

  1. marj

    wow! great… Were studying about photoshop this semester, and it’s really good to experience editing an ugly duckling to a beautiful swan. hahaha.. i learn something from you sir. I hope you share more to us your knowledge about the great uses of photoshop. Thanks!

    Reply
  2. Dave

    I don’t have any issues with retouching when it’s to clear up acne or other blemishes, take the shine off a nose or forehead, minimize some wrinkles, scars, dark rings under the eyes, that sort of thing. Where I have problems with it is when it’s used to modify bone structure, body/face shape, or any other fundamental characteristic of a person’s body structure.

    The before/after example you showed was very well done and made an already attractive woman more attractive. But, to me, it crossed a line and became a misrepresentation when something as fundamental as her facial bone structure was altered. That’s a subjective threshold, I know. Fine wrinkles and blemishes disappearing, OK. Bones being morphed…not so sure about that!

    Reply
  3. John

    I love how people think there is this grand injustice to a bit of photowork on the backend. As if you have some creed to only show people how they look in real life. The picture that was diplayed at the end barely even changed the model, other than to cleanup some skin blemishes and display what she might look like if she lost a bit of facial weight. A modicum of neck lengthening was about the sole change and that was hardly a “misrepresentation”. If you do any magazine work, all of the photos will be edited prior to publication anyway. Your “photographic integrity” that you embrace as putting you above anyone else is worth all of nothing in real life.

    Reply
  4. Dave

    You read a lot more into that post than was meant, and most of it you got wrong. It sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder. In any case, I wasn’t talking about a grand injustice or putting myself above anyone else. It’s just a difference of opinion, nothing to get exercised about.

    Reply
  5. Eternal Images

    Retouching has been done on negatives for years. Now that we can do it easily and more extensively on the computer, we need to “keep it real”. Too much editing looks unnatural. The trick is to learn proper techniques, practice, and get as close to perfect on the shot as possible BEFORE any editing. That is what will make the portrait most impressive. Photos that have key elements out of focus, bad or cluttered backgrounds and are cropped badly will never look very good, no matter how hard you try. The more you know, the better your work will look.

    Reply
  6. Genaro Diaz

    Thank you.
    I am wedding photographer in La Coruña , Galicia , Spain.
    Thanks for the test and articles.
    Greetings.

    Reply

Leave a Reply